Blob Blame History Raw
<!DOCTYPE sgmltool 
         PUBLIC "-//SGML-Tools//DTD SGML-Tools v0.9//EN" >
<!-- ================================================= -->
<!--

    $Id: glossary.sgml,v 1.1.1.1 2001/05/24 15:57:40 sano Exp $
     
    This is glossary.sgml, distributed with SGML-Tools.
    It tests and describes the glossary/description
    element used to introduce and list keywords.

    $Log: glossary.sgml,v $
    Revision 1.1.1.1  2001/05/24 15:57:40  sano
    linuxdoc-tools 0.96
    This is re-imported because of cvs repository is lost
    due to HDD trouble

    Revision 0.1.0.1  2000/05/13 14:59:57  sano
    Initial release of Linuxdoc-Tools

    Revision 1.1  1997/07/09 13:18:47  cg
    * Added contrib/bk, with a lot of work-in-progress from Bernd. (CdG)


    Comments: none.

                                                       -->
<!-- ================================================= -->


<article>

<title>TEST: Keywords and Glossary
<author>b. kreimeier
<date>May 1997

<sect>Keywords
<p>
The glossary or description element is a paragraph
element. However, there is a matching element for
inlined text, to mark up use of <k>keywords</k> in
the text: <c><k></c>. This is supposed to add a
marker for an optional global index, too.

<sect>Definitions and Descriptions
<p>
The description element consists
of a list of keywords, each followed
by one or more definition paragraphs
The glossary does not allow empty definitions.
<define>
<key>Key 1</key> <def>Explanation of Key 1</def>
<key>Key 2 <def>Explanation, part A. In a lengthy explanation, 
           maybe a glossary, this could well be an entire
           paragraph. Formattagin with LaTeX is not alway
           perfect, e.g. a sequence of one line paragraphs
           will have different indentation in first vs.
           subsequent paragraphs.
            <p>
           Explanation, part B.  The right way to fix this,
           of course, is changing the description environment
           in the backend. Basically, this is a layout problem,
           and in no way related to the DTD or SGML. The
           default layout was chosen to match the sufficiently
           ugly looking HTML rendering of DL elements. So there.
</define>
<p>
The <c><define></c> element contains a sequence of definitions,
each consisting of a <c><key></c> and a <c><def></c> element.
The definitions might contain other elements.
Lists and other elements can be used. In
addition, descriptions could be nested.
<define>
<key>Key A <def>List of explanations
            <enum>
            <item>Definition
            <item>Definition
            </enum>
<key>Key B <def>List of keywords
            <define>
            <key>Definition <def> Details
            <key>Definition <def> Details
            </define>
</define>
<p>
Related references within the text should markup <k>keywords</k>
whenever needed. Note that excessive use will bloat the
index.

<sect>Glossary
<p>
Currently, a glossary appendix is not supported. It could
either be generated manually using the <c>descrip</c>
element above, or created automatically be collecting
all definitionsn and descriptions scattered in the text.
For LaTeX, use of <c>makeindex</c>, a modified 
<c>theglossary</c> environment, and a modification of
the <c>glossary</c>command to put out the actual definition
as well are possible.
<p>
For HTML and other backends, even more effort would be
necessary. A good idea might be to rely on LaTeX tools
for assmebling the actual lists, and formatting them
for ASCII or HTML using rather simple filters.

</article>

<!-- ================================================= -->
<!-- end of glossary.sgml                                -->
<!--
     Local Variables:
     mode: sgml
     End:                                              -->
<!-- ================================================= -->