Blob Blame History Raw

Free layout. Some remarks about the current state of the aslts
test suite vs ACPICA. Written up to 20050729 [Jul 30 2005] ACPICA
(some stuff can be obsolete nevertheless useful to pay attention
to the important things).
================================================================



MANY TESTS ARE DISABLED:


Many pieces of AML tests code are now excluded by means of
y<xxx> and qXXX disable/enable variables.

aslts/src/runtime/cntl/runmode.asl:

See description of y<xxx> which disable
many crashing/failing tests executions.

There are 49 such y<xxx> and 6 qXXX/rnXX conditional variables set
to zero in runmode.asl file now - the relevant tests are disabled
in order not to cause crashes, hangs etc...

==================================================================

Information to the new Dynamic Object Deletion complex test.


aslts/src/runtime/collections/IMPL/ACPICA/tests/dynobj/dynobj.asl:



1. These tests require support of ACPICA (_TCI).
   We have not yet delivered it.
   So, now the result of run is like this below.

- ex main
Executing \MAIN
tbxfroot-0267 [12] TbFindTable           : Found table [DSDT]
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x0B] "64-bit mode"
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x34] "TEST (complex), Dynamic Object Deletion complex test"
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x42] "The Test Command interface with the ACPICA (_TCI) is not supported"
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x12] "Test DYN0 skipped!"
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x29] "Run time (in seconds): 0x0000000000000000"
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x38] "The total number of exceptions handled: 0000000000000000"
[ACPI Debug]  String: [0x1A] "TEST ACPICA: 64-bit : PASS"
Execution of \MAIN returned object 00326E38 Buflen 10
  [Integer] = 0000000000000000
- q
 utalloc-1049 [03] UtDumpAllocations     : No outstanding allocations.


2. Many issues are excluded from execution by the variables (rn01 - rn04).
   They are set to zeros now.
   Set them up to non-zeros, run the test and investigate errors:

IMPL/ACPICA/common/icommon.asl:

Name(rn00, 1) // Correct, no any remarks
Name(rn01, 0) // Investigation needed
Name(rn02, 0) // Classified as a bug
Name(rn03, 0) // Causes exception
Name(rn04, 0) // Regression

3. Many minor issues are to be reported
   like this:

   1. In optimized mode Add(3, 4)
      created 4 objects, though 1 is enough
      as that is in Store(Add(3, 4), i000) case...


==================================================================