Blame missing/win_snprintf.c

Packit 209cc3
#include <stdio.h>
Packit 209cc3
#include <stdarg.h>
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
#include "portability.h"
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
int
Packit 209cc3
pcap_vsnprintf(char *str, size_t str_size, const char *format, va_list args)
Packit 209cc3
{
Packit 209cc3
	int ret;
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
	ret = _vsnprintf_s(str, str_size, _TRUNCATE, format, args);
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
	/*
Packit 209cc3
	 * XXX - _vsnprintf() and _snprintf() do *not* guarantee
Packit 209cc3
	 * that str is null-terminated, but C99's vsnprintf()
Packit 209cc3
	 * and snprintf() do, and we want to offer C99 behavior,
Packit 209cc3
	 * so forcibly null-terminate the string.
Packit 209cc3
	 *
Packit 209cc3
	 * We don't, however, offer C99 behavior for the return
Packit 209cc3
	 * value; _vsnprintf_s() returns -1, not the number of
Packit 209cc3
	 * characters that would have been put into the buffer
Packit 209cc3
	 * had it been large enough, if the string is truncated.
Packit 209cc3
	 * The only way to get that value is to use _vscprintf();
Packit 209cc3
	 * getting that count isn't worth the re-formatting.
Packit 209cc3
	 *
Packit 209cc3
	 * XXX - does _vsnprintf_s() return -1 on a formatting
Packit 209cc3
	 * error?
Packit 209cc3
	 */
Packit 209cc3
	str[str_size - 1] = '\0';
Packit 209cc3
	return (ret);
Packit 209cc3
}
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
int
Packit 209cc3
pcap_snprintf(char *str, size_t str_size, const char *format, ...)
Packit 209cc3
{
Packit 209cc3
	va_list args;
Packit 209cc3
	int ret;
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
	va_start(args, format);
Packit 209cc3
	ret = pcap_vsnprintf(str, str_size, format, args);
Packit 209cc3
	va_end(args);
Packit 209cc3
	return (ret);
Packit 209cc3
}