Blame TODO

Packit 209cc3
 TODO list for libpcap
Packit 209cc3
=======================
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
Important stuff (to be done before the next release)
Packit 209cc3
---------------
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
General
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
- configure should not be in Git. Most open source projects have an
Packit 209cc3
  autogen.sh script to run autoconf etc. after checkout. I think we
Packit 209cc3
  should stick to the standard.
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
- The source files should be better documented. There is no official
Packit 209cc3
  design guideline for what is done where. There should be a common coding
Packit 209cc3
  style (okay, you can guess that by looking at the code) and a guide for
Packit 209cc3
  what needs to be documented.
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
Less urgent items
Packit 209cc3
-----------------
Packit 209cc3
Packit 209cc3
- Better documentation and cleanup of the interface. I am seeing a few
Packit 209cc3
  problems at the first glance which needs fixing:
Packit 209cc3
  + pcap_lookupnet makes little to no sense with protocols != IPv4
Packit 209cc3
  + not very well suited for interactive programs (think ethereal). There
Packit 209cc3
    should be a way for the application to get a file descriptor which it
Packit 209cc3
    has to monitor and a callback in pcap which has to be called on
Packit 209cc3
    activity (XXX - "pcap_fileno()" handles the first part, although
Packit 209cc3
    "select()" and "poll()" don't work on BPF devices on most BSDs, and
Packit 209cc3
    you can call "pcap_dispatch()" as the dispatch routine after putting
Packit 209cc3
    the descriptor into non-blocking mode)
Packit 209cc3
  + too many functions. There are a lot of functions for everything which
Packit 209cc3
    violates the KISS principle. Why do we need pcap_strerror, pcap_perror
Packit 209cc3
    and pcap_geterr?
Packit 209cc3
  + the manpage has a brief description of each function but where is the
Packit 209cc3
    big picture? Seems like you need to buy UNP for that...