/* mpn_mu_div_qr, mpn_preinv_mu_div_qr. Compute Q = floor(N / D) and R = N-QD. N is nn limbs and D is dn limbs and must be normalized, and Q must be nn-dn limbs. The requirement that Q is nn-dn limbs (and not nn-dn+1 limbs) was put in place in order to allow us to let N be unmodified during the operation. Contributed to the GNU project by Torbjorn Granlund. THE FUNCTIONS IN THIS FILE ARE INTERNAL WITH MUTABLE INTERFACES. IT IS ONLY SAFE TO REACH THEM THROUGH DOCUMENTED INTERFACES. IN FACT, IT IS ALMOST GUARANTEED THAT THEY WILL CHANGE OR DISAPPEAR IN A FUTURE GMP RELEASE. Copyright 2005-2007, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This file is part of the GNU MP Library. The GNU MP Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of either: * the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. or * the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. or both in parallel, as here. The GNU MP Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received copies of the GNU General Public License and the GNU Lesser General Public License along with the GNU MP Library. If not, see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/. */ /* The idea of the algorithm used herein is to compute a smaller inverted value than used in the standard Barrett algorithm, and thus save time in the Newton iterations, and pay just a small price when using the inverted value for developing quotient bits. This algorithm was presented at ICMS 2006. */ /* CAUTION: This code and the code in mu_divappr_q.c should be edited in sync. Things to work on: * This isn't optimal when the quotient isn't needed, as it might take a lot of space. The computation is always needed, though, so there is no time to save with special code. * The itch/scratch scheme isn't perhaps such a good idea as it once seemed, demonstrated by the fact that the mpn_invertappr function's scratch needs mean that we need to keep a large allocation long after it is needed. Things are worse as mpn_mul_fft does not accept any scratch parameter, which means we'll have a large memory hole while in mpn_mul_fft. In general, a peak scratch need in the beginning of a function isn't well-handled by the itch/scratch scheme. */ #ifdef STAT #undef STAT #define STAT(x) x #else #define STAT(x) #endif #include /* for NULL */ #include "gmp.h" #include "gmp-impl.h" /* FIXME: The MU_DIV_QR_SKEW_THRESHOLD was not analysed properly. It gives a speedup according to old measurements, but does the decision mechanism really make sense? It seem like the quotient between dn and qn might be what we really should be checking. */ #ifndef MU_DIV_QR_SKEW_THRESHOLD #define MU_DIV_QR_SKEW_THRESHOLD 100 #endif #ifdef CHECK /* FIXME: Enable in minithres */ #undef MU_DIV_QR_SKEW_THRESHOLD #define MU_DIV_QR_SKEW_THRESHOLD 1 #endif static mp_limb_t mpn_mu_div_qr2 (mp_ptr, mp_ptr, mp_srcptr, mp_size_t, mp_srcptr, mp_size_t, mp_ptr); mp_limb_t mpn_mu_div_qr (mp_ptr qp, mp_ptr rp, mp_srcptr np, mp_size_t nn, mp_srcptr dp, mp_size_t dn, mp_ptr scratch) { mp_size_t qn; mp_limb_t cy, qh; qn = nn - dn; if (qn + MU_DIV_QR_SKEW_THRESHOLD < dn) { /* |______________|_ign_first__| dividend nn |_______|_ign_first__| divisor dn |______| quotient (prel) qn |___________________| quotient * ignored-divisor-part dn-1 */ /* Compute a preliminary quotient and a partial remainder by dividing the most significant limbs of each operand. */ qh = mpn_mu_div_qr2 (qp, rp + nn - (2 * qn + 1), np + nn - (2 * qn + 1), 2 * qn + 1, dp + dn - (qn + 1), qn + 1, scratch); /* Multiply the quotient by the divisor limbs ignored above. */ if (dn - (qn + 1) > qn) mpn_mul (scratch, dp, dn - (qn + 1), qp, qn); /* prod is dn-1 limbs */ else mpn_mul (scratch, qp, qn, dp, dn - (qn + 1)); /* prod is dn-1 limbs */ if (qh) cy = mpn_add_n (scratch + qn, scratch + qn, dp, dn - (qn + 1)); else cy = 0; scratch[dn - 1] = cy; cy = mpn_sub_n (rp, np, scratch, nn - (2 * qn + 1)); cy = mpn_sub_nc (rp + nn - (2 * qn + 1), rp + nn - (2 * qn + 1), scratch + nn - (2 * qn + 1), qn + 1, cy); if (cy) { qh -= mpn_sub_1 (qp, qp, qn, 1); mpn_add_n (rp, rp, dp, dn); } } else { qh = mpn_mu_div_qr2 (qp, rp, np, nn, dp, dn, scratch); } return qh; } static mp_limb_t mpn_mu_div_qr2 (mp_ptr qp, mp_ptr rp, mp_srcptr np, mp_size_t nn, mp_srcptr dp, mp_size_t dn, mp_ptr scratch) { mp_size_t qn, in; mp_limb_t cy, qh; mp_ptr ip, tp; ASSERT (dn > 1); qn = nn - dn; /* Compute the inverse size. */ in = mpn_mu_div_qr_choose_in (qn, dn, 0); ASSERT (in <= dn); #if 1 /* This alternative inverse computation method gets slightly more accurate results. FIXMEs: (1) Temp allocation needs not analysed (2) itch function not adapted (3) mpn_invertappr scratch needs not met. */ ip = scratch; tp = scratch + in + 1; /* compute an approximate inverse on (in+1) limbs */ if (dn == in) { MPN_COPY (tp + 1, dp, in); tp[0] = 1; mpn_invertappr (ip, tp, in + 1, tp + in + 1); MPN_COPY_INCR (ip, ip + 1, in); } else { cy = mpn_add_1 (tp, dp + dn - (in + 1), in + 1, 1); if (UNLIKELY (cy != 0)) MPN_ZERO (ip, in); else { mpn_invertappr (ip, tp, in + 1, tp + in + 1); MPN_COPY_INCR (ip, ip + 1, in); } } #else /* This older inverse computation method gets slightly worse results than the one above. */ ip = scratch; tp = scratch + in; /* Compute inverse of D to in+1 limbs, then round to 'in' limbs. Ideally the inversion function should do this automatically. */ if (dn == in) { tp[in + 1] = 0; MPN_COPY (tp + in + 2, dp, in); mpn_invertappr (tp, tp + in + 1, in + 1, NULL); } else { mpn_invertappr (tp, dp + dn - (in + 1), in + 1, NULL); } cy = mpn_sub_1 (tp, tp, in + 1, GMP_NUMB_HIGHBIT); if (UNLIKELY (cy != 0)) MPN_ZERO (tp + 1, in); MPN_COPY (ip, tp + 1, in); #endif qh = mpn_preinv_mu_div_qr (qp, rp, np, nn, dp, dn, ip, in, scratch + in); return qh; } mp_limb_t mpn_preinv_mu_div_qr (mp_ptr qp, mp_ptr rp, mp_srcptr np, mp_size_t nn, mp_srcptr dp, mp_size_t dn, mp_srcptr ip, mp_size_t in, mp_ptr scratch) { mp_size_t qn; mp_limb_t cy, cx, qh; mp_limb_t r; mp_size_t tn, wn; #define tp scratch #define scratch_out (scratch + tn) qn = nn - dn; np += qn; qp += qn; qh = mpn_cmp (np, dp, dn) >= 0; if (qh != 0) mpn_sub_n (rp, np, dp, dn); else MPN_COPY_INCR (rp, np, dn); /* if (qn == 0) */ /* The while below handles this case */ /* return qh; */ /* Degenerate use. Should we allow this? */ while (qn > 0) { if (qn < in) { ip += in - qn; in = qn; } np -= in; qp -= in; /* Compute the next block of quotient limbs by multiplying the inverse I by the upper part of the partial remainder R. */ mpn_mul_n (tp, rp + dn - in, ip, in); /* mulhi */ cy = mpn_add_n (qp, tp + in, rp + dn - in, in); /* I's msb implicit */ ASSERT_ALWAYS (cy == 0); qn -= in; /* Compute the product of the quotient block and the divisor D, to be subtracted from the partial remainder combined with new limbs from the dividend N. We only really need the low dn+1 limbs. */ if (BELOW_THRESHOLD (in, MUL_TO_MULMOD_BNM1_FOR_2NXN_THRESHOLD)) mpn_mul (tp, dp, dn, qp, in); /* dn+in limbs, high 'in' cancels */ else { tn = mpn_mulmod_bnm1_next_size (dn + 1); mpn_mulmod_bnm1 (tp, tn, dp, dn, qp, in, scratch_out); wn = dn + in - tn; /* number of wrapped limbs */ if (wn > 0) { cy = mpn_sub_n (tp, tp, rp + dn - wn, wn); cy = mpn_sub_1 (tp + wn, tp + wn, tn - wn, cy); cx = mpn_cmp (rp + dn - in, tp + dn, tn - dn) < 0; ASSERT_ALWAYS (cx >= cy); mpn_incr_u (tp, cx - cy); } } r = rp[dn - in] - tp[dn]; /* Subtract the product from the partial remainder combined with new limbs from the dividend N, generating a new partial remainder R. */ if (dn != in) { cy = mpn_sub_n (tp, np, tp, in); /* get next 'in' limbs from N */ cy = mpn_sub_nc (tp + in, rp, tp + in, dn - in, cy); MPN_COPY (rp, tp, dn); /* FIXME: try to avoid this */ } else { cy = mpn_sub_n (rp, np, tp, in); /* get next 'in' limbs from N */ } STAT (int i; int err = 0; static int errarr[5]; static int err_rec; static int tot); /* Check the remainder R and adjust the quotient as needed. */ r -= cy; while (r != 0) { /* We loop 0 times with about 69% probability, 1 time with about 31% probability, 2 times with about 0.6% probability, if inverse is computed as recommended. */ mpn_incr_u (qp, 1); cy = mpn_sub_n (rp, rp, dp, dn); r -= cy; STAT (err++); } if (mpn_cmp (rp, dp, dn) >= 0) { /* This is executed with about 76% probability. */ mpn_incr_u (qp, 1); cy = mpn_sub_n (rp, rp, dp, dn); STAT (err++); } STAT ( tot++; errarr[err]++; if (err > err_rec) err_rec = err; if (tot % 0x10000 == 0) { for (i = 0; i <= err_rec; i++) printf (" %d(%.1f%%)", errarr[i], 100.0*errarr[i]/tot); printf ("\n"); } ); } return qh; } /* In case k=0 (automatic choice), we distinguish 3 cases: (a) dn < qn: in = ceil(qn / ceil(qn/dn)) (b) dn/3 < qn <= dn: in = ceil(qn / 2) (c) qn < dn/3: in = qn In all cases we have in <= dn. */ mp_size_t mpn_mu_div_qr_choose_in (mp_size_t qn, mp_size_t dn, int k) { mp_size_t in; if (k == 0) { mp_size_t b; if (qn > dn) { /* Compute an inverse size that is a nice partition of the quotient. */ b = (qn - 1) / dn + 1; /* ceil(qn/dn), number of blocks */ in = (qn - 1) / b + 1; /* ceil(qn/b) = ceil(qn / ceil(qn/dn)) */ } else if (3 * qn > dn) { in = (qn - 1) / 2 + 1; /* b = 2 */ } else { in = (qn - 1) / 1 + 1; /* b = 1 */ } } else { mp_size_t xn; xn = MIN (dn, qn); in = (xn - 1) / k + 1; } return in; } mp_size_t mpn_mu_div_qr_itch (mp_size_t nn, mp_size_t dn, int mua_k) { mp_size_t in = mpn_mu_div_qr_choose_in (nn - dn, dn, mua_k); mp_size_t itch_preinv = mpn_preinv_mu_div_qr_itch (nn, dn, in); mp_size_t itch_invapp = mpn_invertappr_itch (in + 1) + in + 2; /* 3in + 4 */ ASSERT (itch_preinv >= itch_invapp); return in + MAX (itch_invapp, itch_preinv); } mp_size_t mpn_preinv_mu_div_qr_itch (mp_size_t nn, mp_size_t dn, mp_size_t in) { mp_size_t itch_local = mpn_mulmod_bnm1_next_size (dn + 1); mp_size_t itch_out = mpn_mulmod_bnm1_itch (itch_local, dn, in); return itch_local + itch_out; }