CommonMark is a rationalized version of Markdown syntax, with a spec and BSD3-licensed reference implementations in C and JavaScript.
The C implementation provides both a shared library (libcmark
) and a
standalone program cmark
that converts CommonMark to HTML. It is
written in standard C99 and has no library dependencies. The parser is
very fast (see benchmarks).
It is easy to use libcmark
in python, lua, ruby, and other dynamic
languages: see the wrappers/
subdirectory for some simple examples.
The JavaScript implementation provides both an NPM package and a single JavaScript file, with no dependencies, that can be linked into an HTML page. For further information, see the README in the js directory.
A note on security: Neither implementation attempts to sanitize link attributes or raw HTML. If you use these libraries in applications that accept untrusted user input, you must run the output through an HTML sanitizer to protect against XSS attacks.
Building the C program (cmark
) and shared library (libcmark
)
requires cmake. If you modify scanners.re
, then you will also
need re2c, which is used to generate scanners.c
from
scanners.re
. We have included a pre-generated scanners.c
in
the repository to reduce build dependencies.
If you have GNU make, you can simply make
, make test
, and make
install
. This calls cmake to create a Makefile
in the build
directory, then uses that Makefile
to create the executable and
library. The binaries can be found in build/src
.
For a more portable method, you can use cmake manually. cmake knows how to create build environments for many build systems. For example, on FreeBSD:
mkdir build cd build cmake .. # optionally: -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=path make # executable will be created as build/src/cmark make test make install
Or, to create Xcode project files on OSX:
mkdir build cd build cmake -G Xcode .. make make test make install
The GNU Makefile also provides a few other targets for developers. To run a benchmark:
make bench
To run a "fuzz test" against ten long randomly generated inputs:
make fuzztest
To run a test for memory leaks using valgrind
:
make leakcheck
To reformat source code using astyle
:
make astyle
To make a release tarball and zip archive:
make archive
To compile with MSVC and NMAKE:
nmake
You can cross-compile a Windows binary and dll on linux if you have the
mingw32
compiler:
make mingw
The binaries will be in build-mingw/windows/bin
.
The JavaScript library can be installed through npm
:
npm install commonmark
This includes a command-line converter called commonmark
.
If you want to use it in a client application, you can fetch
a pre-built copy of commonmark.js
from
http://spec.commonmark.org/js/commonmark.js.
For further information, see the README in the js directory.
The spec contains over 500 embedded examples which serve as conformance
tests. To run the tests using an executable $PROG
:
python3 test/spec_tests.py --program $PROG
If you want to extract the raw test data from the spec without actually running the tests, you can do:
python3 test/spec_tests.py --dump-tests
and you'll get all the tests in JSON format.
The source of the spec is spec.txt
. This is basically a Markdown
file, with code examples written in a shorthand form:
. Markdown source . expected HTML output .
To build an HTML version of the spec, do make spec.html
. To build a
PDF version, do make spec.pdf
. (Creating a PDF requires pandoc
and a LaTeX installation. Creating the HTML version requires only
libcmark
and python3
.)
The spec is written from the point of view of the human writer, not the computer reader. It is not an algorithm---an English translation of a computer program---but a declarative description of what counts as a block quote, a code block, and each of the other structural elements that can make up a Markdown document.
Because John Gruber's canonical syntax description leaves many aspects of the syntax undetermined, writing a precise spec requires making a large number of decisions, many of them somewhat arbitrary. In making them, we have appealed to existing conventions and considerations of simplicity, readability, expressive power, and consistency. We have tried to ensure that "normal" documents in the many incompatible existing implementations of Markdown will render, as far as possible, as their authors intended. And we have tried to make the rules for different elements work together harmoniously. In places where different decisions could have been made (for example, the rules governing list indentation), we have explained the rationale for my choices. In a few cases, we have departed slightly from the canonical syntax description, in ways that we think further the goals of Markdown as stated in that description.
For the most part, we have limited ourselves to the basic elements described in Gruber's canonical syntax description, eschewing extensions like footnotes and definition lists. It is important to get the core right before considering such things. However, we have included a visible syntax for line breaks and fenced code blocks.
There are only a few places where this spec says things that contradict the canonical syntax description:
It allows all punctuation symbols to be backslash-escaped, not just the symbols with special meanings in Markdown. We found that it was just too hard to remember which symbols could be escaped.
It introduces an alternative syntax for hard line breaks, a backslash at the end of the line, supplementing the two-spaces-at-the-end-of-line rule. This is motivated by persistent complaints about the “invisible” nature of the two-space rule.
Link syntax has been made a bit more predictable (in a
backwards-compatible way). For example, Markdown.pl
allows single
quotes around a title in inline links, but not in reference links.
This kind of difference is really hard for users to remember, so the
spec allows single quotes in both contexts.
The rule for HTML blocks differs, though in most real cases it shouldn't make a difference. (See the section on HTML Blocks for details.) The spec's proposal makes it easy to include Markdown inside HTML block-level tags, if you want to, but also allows you to exclude this. It is also makes parsing much easier, avoiding expensive backtracking.
It does not collapse adjacent bird-track blocks into a single blockquote:
> this is two > blockquotes > this is a single > > blockquote with two paragraphs
Rules for content in lists differ in a few respects, though (as with HTML blocks), most lists in existing documents should render as intended. There is some discussion of the choice points and differences in the subsection of List Items entitled Motivation. We think that the spec's proposal does better than any existing implementation in rendering lists the way a human writer or reader would intuitively understand them. (We could give numerous examples of perfectly natural looking lists that nearly every existing implementation flubs up.)
The spec stipulates that two blank lines break out of all list contexts. This is an attempt to deal with issues that often come up when someone wants to have two adjacent lists, or a list followed by an indented code block.
Changing bullet characters, or changing from bullets to numbers or vice versa, starts a new list. We think that is almost always going to be the writer's intent.
The number that begins an ordered list item may be followed by
either .
or )
. Changing the delimiter style starts a new
list.
The start number of an ordered list is significant.
Fenced code blocks are supported, delimited by either
backticks (```
or tildes (~~~
).
There is a forum for discussing CommonMark; you should use it instead of github issues for questions and possibly open-ended discussions. Use the github issue tracker only for simple, clear, actionable issues.
The spec was written by John MacFarlane, drawing on
John MacFarlane was also responsible for the original versions of the C and JavaScript implementations. The block parsing algorithm was worked out together with David Greenspan. Vicent Marti optimized the C implementation for performance, increasing its speed tenfold. Kārlis Gaņģis helped work out a better parsing algorithm for links and emphasis, eliminating several worst-case performance issues. Nick Wellnhofer contributed many improvements, including most of the C library's API and its test harness. Vitaly Puzrin has offered much good advice about the JavaScript implementation.
the simple example of a blockquote the simple example of a blockquote the simple example of a blockquote the simple example of a blockquote ... continuation ... continuation ... continuation ... continuation
empty blockquote:
deeply nested blockquote deeply nested blockquote deeply nested blockquote deeply nested blockquote deeply nested blockquote deeply nested blockquote
deeply nested blockquote
deeply nested blockquote
deeply nested blockquote
deeply nested blockquote
deeply nested blockquote
deeply nested blockquote
an example of a code block
an example ``` of a fenced ``` code block
******* text
**test** |
test |
not a heading ----------------------------------- text - tidy - bullet - list
loose
bullet
list
- - - -
1. 2. 3.
an example of a list item with a continuation
this part is inside the list
this part is just a paragraph
test - test
is this a valid bullet?
this
a
long - loose - list
tidy
in
between
this
1
[looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong label]
111 'test' [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ this should not slow down anything ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]: q (as long as it is not referenced anywhere)
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]: this is not a valid reference [[[[[[[foo]]]]]]]
[[[[[[[foo]]]]]]]: bar [[[[[[foo]]]]]]: bar [[[[[foo]]]]]: bar [[[[foo]]]]: bar [[[foo]]]: bar [[foo]]: bar
[[[[[foo]]]]]
[[[[[foo]]]]]: bar [[[[foo]]]]: bar [[[foo]]]: bar [[foo]]: bar
closed (valid) autolinks:
ftp://1.2.3.4:21/path/foo http://foo.bar.baz?q=hello&id=22&boolean http://veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery.loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong.autolink/ teeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeest@gmail.com
these are not autolinks:
i
wonderhow
thiswill
beparsed
this is your basic boring emphasis
this is your basic boring emphasis
this is your basic boring emphasis this is a bunch of nested emphases
this __is __a __bunch of__ nested__ emphases__
this is a bunch of nested emphases this is a worst case for em backtracking
__this __is __a __worst __case __for __em __backtracking
this is a worst case for em backtracking entities:
& © Æ Ď ¾ ℋ ⅆ ∲
# Ӓ Ϡ
non-entities:
&18900987654321234567890; &1234567890098765432123456789009876543212345678987654;
&qwertyuioppoiuytrewqwer; &oiuytrewqwertyuioiuytrewqwertyuioytrewqwertyuiiuytri;
\t\e\s\t\i\n\g \e\s\c\a\p\e \s\e\q\u\e\n\c\e\s
!\\"#\$\%\&\'()*+\,.\/\:\;\<\=>\?
\@ [ ] \^ _ ` { | } \~ - \'
\ \ \\ \\ \\\
\<this> \<is> \<not> \<html>
Taking commonmark tests from the spec for benchmarking here:
foo
foo
foo <?php echo $a; ?>
foo <!ELEMENT br EMPTY>
foo <![CDATA[>&<]]>
this is a link this is a link this is a link ![this is an image](http://something.example.com/foo/bar 'test')
escape test escape test ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
Invalid links:
[this is not a link
[this is not a link](
[this is not a link](http://something.example.com/foo/bar 'test'
[this is not a link](((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
this is not a link)))))))) (((((((((())))))))))) Valid links:
[[[[[[[](test)](test)](test)](test)](test)](test)]
[ [[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]] ](test)
Invalid links:
[[[[[[[[[
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![![
this\ should\ be\ separated\ by\ newlines
this
should
be
separated
by
newlines
too
this should not be separated by newlines
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras imperdiet nec erat ac condimentum. Nulla vel rutrum ligula. Sed hendrerit interdum orci a posuere. Vivamus ut velit aliquet, mollis purus eget, iaculis nisl. Proin posuere malesuada ante. Proin auctor orci eros, ac molestie lorem dictum nec. Vestibulum sit amet erat est. Morbi luctus sed elit ac luctus. Proin blandit, enim vitae egestas posuere, neque elit ultricies dui, vel mattis nibh enim ac lorem. Maecenas molestie nisl sit amet velit dictum lobortis. Aliquam erat volutpat.
Vivamus sagittis, diam in vehicula lobortis, sapien arcu mattis erat, vel aliquet sem urna et risus. Ut feugiat sapien vitae mi elementum laoreet. Suspendisse potenti. Aliquam erat nisl, aliquam pretium libero aliquet, sagittis eleifend nunc. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Integer turpis augue, tincidunt dignissim mauris id, rhoncus dapibus purus. Maecenas et enim odio. Nullam massa metus, varius quis vehicula sed, pharetra mollis erat. In quis viverra velit. Vivamus placerat, est nec hendrerit varius, enim dui hendrerit magna, ut pulvinar nibh lorem vel lacus. Mauris a orci iaculis, hendrerit eros sed, gravida leo. In dictum mauris vel augue varius, ac ullamcorper nisl ornare. In eu posuere velit, ac fermentum arcu. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Nullam sed malesuada leo, at interdum elit.
Nullam ut tincidunt nunc. Pellentesque metus lacus, commodo eget justo ut, rutrum varius nunc. Sed non rhoncus risus. Morbi sodales gravida pulvinar. Duis malesuada, odio volutpat elementum vulputate, massa magna scelerisque ante, et accumsan tellus nunc in sem. Donec mattis arcu et velit aliquet, non sagittis justo vestibulum. Suspendisse volutpat felis lectus, nec consequat ipsum mattis id. Donec dapibus vehicula facilisis. In tincidunt mi nisi, nec faucibus tortor euismod nec. Suspendisse ante ligula, aliquet vitae libero eu, vulputate dapibus libero. Sed bibendum, sapien at posuere interdum, libero est sollicitudin magna, ac gravida tellus purus eu ipsum. Proin ut quam arcu.
Suspendisse potenti. Donec ante velit, ornare at augue quis, tristique laoreet sem. Etiam in ipsum elit. Nullam cursus dolor sit amet nulla feugiat tristique. Phasellus ac tellus tincidunt, imperdiet purus eget, ullamcorper ipsum. Cras eu tincidunt sem. Nullam sed dapibus magna. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In id venenatis tortor. In consectetur sollicitudin pharetra. Etiam convallis nisi nunc, et aliquam turpis viverra sit amet. Maecenas faucibus sodales tortor. Suspendisse lobortis mi eu leo viverra volutpat. Pellentesque velit ante, vehicula sodales congue ut, elementum a urna. Cras tempor, ipsum eget luctus rhoncus, arcu ligula fermentum urna, vulputate pharetra enim enim non libero.
Proin diam quam, elementum in eleifend id, elementum et metus. Cras in justo consequat justo semper ultrices. Sed dignissim lectus a ante mollis, nec vulputate ante molestie. Proin in porta nunc. Etiam pulvinar turpis sed velit porttitor, vel adipiscing velit fringilla. Cras ac tellus vitae purus pharetra tincidunt. Sed cursus aliquet aliquet. Cras eleifend commodo malesuada. In turpis turpis, ullamcorper ut tincidunt a, ullamcorper a nunc. Etiam luctus tellus ac dapibus gravida. Ut nec lacus laoreet neque ullamcorper volutpat.
Nunc et leo erat. Aenean mattis ultrices lorem, eget adipiscing dolor ultricies eu. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus cursus feugiat sapien quis aliquam. Mauris quam libero, porta vel volutpat ut, blandit a purus. Vivamus vestibulum dui vel tortor molestie, sit amet feugiat sem commodo. Nulla facilisi. Sed molestie arcu eget tellus vestibulum tristique.
this is a test for tab expansion, be careful not to replace them with spaces
1 4444 22 333 333 22 4444 1
tab-indented line space-indented line tab-indented line
a lot of spaces in between here
a lot of tabs in between here