Blame tests/line_directives.dts

Packit 2ad57b
/dts-v1/;
Packit 2ad57b
Packit 2ad57b
/* common format */
Packit 2ad57b
#line 3 "foo.dts"
Packit 2ad57b
/* newer gcc format */
Packit 2ad57b
# 9 "baz.dts" 1
Packit 2ad57b
/* flags are optional */
Packit 2ad57b
# 6 "bar.dts"
Packit 2ad57b
Packit 2ad57b
/ {
Packit 2ad57b
/*
Packit 2ad57b
 * Make sure optional flags don't consume integer data on next line. The issue
Packit 2ad57b
 * was that the {WS} in the trailing ({WS}+[0-9]+)? could cross the * line-
Packit 2ad57b
 * break, and consume the leading "0" of the hex constant, leaving "x12345678"
Packit 2ad57b
 * to be parsed as a number, which is invalid syntax.
Packit 2ad57b
 */
Packit 2ad57b
	prop1 = <
Packit 2ad57b
# 10 "qux.dts"
Packit 2ad57b
		0x12345678
Packit 2ad57b
	>;
Packit 2ad57b
/*
Packit 2ad57b
 * Check processing of escapes in filenames
Packit 2ad57b
 */
Packit 2ad57b
# 100 "\".dts"
Packit 2ad57b
# 200 "\\.dts"
Packit 2ad57b
};