Blame lib/stdbool.in.h

Packit Service fdd496
/* Copyright (C) 2001-2003, 2006-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Packit Service fdd496
   Written by Bruno Haible <haible@clisp.cons.org>, 2001.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
Packit Service fdd496
   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
Packit Service fdd496
   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
Packit Service fdd496
   any later version.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
Packit Service fdd496
   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
Packit Service fdd496
   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
Packit Service fdd496
   GNU General Public License for more details.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
Packit Service fdd496
   along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
#ifndef _GL_STDBOOL_H
Packit Service fdd496
#define _GL_STDBOOL_H
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
/* ISO C 99 <stdbool.h> for platforms that lack it.  */
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
/* Usage suggestions:
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   Programs that use <stdbool.h> should be aware of some limitations
Packit Service fdd496
   and standards compliance issues.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   Standards compliance:
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - <stdbool.h> must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true'
Packit Service fdd496
         can be used.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false,
Packit Service fdd496
         as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature".
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment:
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - <stdbool.h> must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - Bit-fields of type 'bool' are not supported.  Portable code
Packit Service fdd496
         should use 'unsigned int foo : 1;' rather than 'bool foo : 1;'.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are
Packit Service fdd496
         performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted
Packit Service fdd496
         to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'.  This doesn't work
Packit Service fdd496
         with this substitute.  With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1
Packit Service fdd496
         give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
       - C99 allows the use of (_Bool)0.0 in constant expressions, but
Packit Service fdd496
         this substitute cannot always provide this property.
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
   Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool';
Packit Service fdd496
   this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common.  */
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
/* 7.16. Boolean type and values */
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
/* BeOS <sys/socket.h> already #defines false 0, true 1.  We use the same
Packit Service fdd496
   definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them.  */
Packit Service fdd496
#if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__
Packit Service fdd496
# include <OS.h> /* defines bool but not _Bool */
Packit Service fdd496
# undef false
Packit Service fdd496
# undef true
Packit Service fdd496
#endif
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
#ifdef __cplusplus
Packit Service fdd496
# define _Bool bool
Packit Service fdd496
# define bool bool
Packit Service fdd496
#else
Packit Service fdd496
# if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__
Packit Service fdd496
  /* A compiler known to have 'bool'.  */
Packit Service fdd496
  /* If the compiler already has both 'bool' and '_Bool', we can assume they
Packit Service fdd496
     are the same types.  */
Packit Service fdd496
#  if !@HAVE__BOOL@
Packit Service fdd496
typedef bool _Bool;
Packit Service fdd496
#  endif
Packit Service fdd496
# else
Packit Service fdd496
#  if !defined __GNUC__
Packit Service fdd496
   /* If @HAVE__BOOL@:
Packit Service fdd496
        Some HP-UX cc and AIX IBM C compiler versions have compiler bugs when
Packit Service fdd496
        the built-in _Bool type is used.  See
Packit Service fdd496
          http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html
Packit Service fdd496
          http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html
Packit Service fdd496
          http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html
Packit Service fdd496
        Similar bugs are likely with other compilers as well; this file
Packit Service fdd496
        wouldn't be used if <stdbool.h> was working.
Packit Service fdd496
        So we override the _Bool type.
Packit Service fdd496
      If !@HAVE__BOOL@:
Packit Service fdd496
        Need to define _Bool ourselves. As 'signed char' or as an enum type?
Packit Service fdd496
        Use of a typedef, with SunPRO C, leads to a stupid
Packit Service fdd496
          "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99".
Packit Service fdd496
        Use of an enum type, with IRIX cc, leads to a stupid
Packit Service fdd496
          "warning(1185): enumerated type mixed with another type".
Packit Service fdd496
        Even the existence of an enum type, without a typedef,
Packit Service fdd496
          "Invalid enumerator. (badenum)" with HP-UX cc on Tru64.
Packit Service fdd496
        The only benefit of the enum, debuggability, is not important
Packit Service fdd496
        with these compilers.  So use 'signed char' and no enum.  */
Packit Service fdd496
#   define _Bool signed char
Packit Service fdd496
#  else
Packit Service fdd496
   /* With this compiler, trust the _Bool type if the compiler has it.  */
Packit Service fdd496
#   if !@HAVE__BOOL@
Packit Service fdd496
   /* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, define true and false as
Packit Service fdd496
      enum constants, not only as macros.
Packit Service fdd496
      It is tempting to write
Packit Service fdd496
         typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
Packit Service fdd496
      so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically.  But then
Packit Service fdd496
      values of type '_Bool' might promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int'
Packit Service fdd496
      (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int'
Packit Service fdd496
      (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)).  So add a negative value to the
Packit Service fdd496
      enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'.  */
Packit Service fdd496
typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
Packit Service fdd496
#   endif
Packit Service fdd496
#  endif
Packit Service fdd496
# endif
Packit Service fdd496
# define bool _Bool
Packit Service fdd496
#endif
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives.  */
Packit Service fdd496
#ifdef __cplusplus
Packit Service fdd496
# define false false
Packit Service fdd496
# define true true
Packit Service fdd496
#else
Packit Service fdd496
# define false 0
Packit Service fdd496
# define true 1
Packit Service fdd496
#endif
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1
Packit Service fdd496
Packit Service fdd496
#endif /* _GL_STDBOOL_H */